Page 27 - ZEB AnnualReport 2015
P. 27

ZERO VILLAGE BERGEN


          MISMATCH BETWEEN SOLAR POWER GENERATION AND THE ELECTRIC LOAD IN A ZERO EMISSIONS
          NEIGHBORHOOD
          MISMATCH MELLOM SOLENERGIPRODUKSJON OG ELEKTRISK BELASTNING I ET NULLUTSLIPPS
          BOLIGOMRÅDE (ZEN - ZERO EMISSIONS NEIGHBORHOOD)



          Igor Sartori (SINTEF) and Stanislas Merclet (Multiconsult)




          A new housing estate is planned close to   the buildings in order to assess the degree   simulations in the software IDA ICE, assuming
          Bergen. Its ambitious goal is, considering the   of mismatch. This can be done at different   the buildings to be built according to the
          total energy demand of the buildings, to reach  scales: yearly, seasonally, monthly (most   Norwegian passive house standard. Both
          a Zero Emission Building (ZEB) target for the   common), daily, and hourly. In order to   generation and load proiles were, of course,
          entire neighborhood. The project, “Zero Village  achieve as precise a study as possible,   based on the same hourly weather data
          Bergen”, consists of more than 700 dwellings   we chose to compare hourly values. We   ile in order to guarantee consistency when
          divided between single-family dwellings and   simulated PV generation proiles using state-  addressing the mismatch between the two.
          apartment buildings. It also includes non-  of-the-art software PV syst and considered the
          residential areas such as ofices, shops, and a  variety of roof orientations and shading effects  The preliminary results show that, at an
          kindergarten.                      from a 3D model of the buildings.   aggregated level, the PV system covers
                                                                                 approximately 90% of the electric demand.
          Solar systems (in this case solar cells - PV)   Electric load proiles for residential buildings   Zero Village Bergen has a total electricity need
          have multiple beneits when integrated in   were obtained from a so-called “TUD” (for   of 3,3 GWh/year, while the PV plant generates
          buildings, but solar energy is, by deinition,   Time of Use Data) methodology, based on   in total 2,9 GWh/year. At more detailed levels,
          a weather dependent energy source. We   the normalization of data from surveys among  due to mismatch between periods of use and
          therefore had to simulate PV production   real households. We calculated thermal   periods of production, one must differentiate
          and compare it with the energy needs in   loads using dynamic energy performance   between self-consumption (the portion of PV




                                                                                               ZEB annual report 2015   27
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32